Evidence graph · finding
LitigationhighVerified2021-06-11
Lennox v. Ethical Products (D.N.J. 2021): Nothin' to Hide 'contains rawhide', digestibility claims false
Lanham Act false-advertising suit (2:21-cv-12437) alleging Ethical 'falsely represented that its Nothin' Chews do not contain rawhide, when they in fact do' and that 'superior digestibility' claims were untrue; sought cancellation of Ethical's mark. Court denied Ethical's motion to bifurcate discovery 2021-12-02. Final disposition not retrieved. Stipulation of dismissal filed 2022-07-06; terminated 2022-07-07; terms not public.
Needs manual pull (PACER/CourtListener RECAP): docket 2:21-cv-12437 for outcome, Zelinger declaration (ECF 22-2), and defense counsel/insurer.
Sources (2)
- D.N.J. opinion, Lennox Int'l v. Ethical Products 2:21-cv-12437 (govinfo PDF)court opinion2021-12-02Verified
- CourtListener docket 2:21-cv-12437 (RECAP)docketVerified
Upstream: what leads here
Downstream: what this leads to
- Marketed 'do not melt or drip', 'tongue will not stick', 'chew unaided', 'easy digestibility' — no warningsdigestibility-claims pattern